SHIVA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/20981/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010641032026

Filing Number

CRM-M/29221/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20981/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVA

    Adv. SAHIL GOEL

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/20981/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Shiva's anticipatory bail petition in a forgery case. Shiva was accused of creating forged experience certificates with fake signatures and stamps of the District Programme Officer and selling them for Rs.12,000, charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court found the allegations serious, noting that custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation and that granting pre-arrest bail would hamper the inquiry and embolden fraudulent activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20981/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/20981/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Shiva's anticipatory bail petition in a forgery case. Shiva was accused of creating forged experience certificates with fake signatures and stamps of the District Programme Officer and selling them for Rs.12,000, charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court found the allegations serious, noting that custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation and that granting pre-arrest bail would hamper the inquiry and embolden fraudulent activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case