SAMINDER JIT KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11826/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010640192026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22795/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11826/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.7 - SERVICE-EDU-PUNJAB(SECONDARY)(TGT) ( 796 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMINDER JIT KAUR

    Adv. NITESH SINGLA

  2. 2.Saminder Jit Kaur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Saminder Jit Kaur

  3. 3.The Director Public Instructions

  4. 4.Raghwinder Bhatia

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Saminder Jit Kaur's petition challenging pay anomalies between senior and junior government employees under a 2019 Punjab Finance Department notification. Without adjudicating the merits, the court directed the respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's pending legal notice (dated 08.01.2026) by passing a reasoned order within three months, after affording the petitioner a hearing opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11826/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Saminder Jit Kaur's petition challenging pay anomalies between senior and junior government employees under a 2019 Punjab Finance Department notification. Without adjudicating the merits, the court directed the respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's pending legal notice (dated 08.01.2026) by passing a reasoned order within three months, after affording the petitioner a hearing opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case