SANJIV GUPTA & ANR vs RAJIV GUPTA & ORS — CR/3350/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010632082026

Filing Number

CR/22510/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

CR/3350/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJIV GUPTA & ANR

    Adv. ASHOK BHARDWAJ

  2. 2.RAJIV GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV GUPTA & ORS

  2. 2.RAJIV GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: CR-3350-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the petition and granted defendants Sanjiv Gupta and another a final opportunity to file their written statement in the property dispute suit, despite an earlier order limiting them to one chance. The court found that the defendants' failure to appear on 22.09.2025 resulted from a bar association strike causing confusion about the hearing date, not deliberate negligence, and that adjudication on merits should prevail over procedural technicalities in property rights cases. The written statement must be filed by 16.05.2026 with ₹50,000 costs payable to the plaintiff, with no further extensions permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/3350/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR-3350-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the petition and granted defendants Sanjiv Gupta and another a final opportunity to file their written statement in the property dispute suit, despite an earlier order limiting them to one chance. The court found that the defendants' failure to appear on 22.09.2025 resulted from a bar association strike causing confusion about the hearing date, not deliberate negligence, and that adjudication on merits should prevail over procedural technicalities in property rights cases. The written statement must be filed by 16.05.2026 with ₹50,000 costs payable to the plaintiff, with no further extensions permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case