SATPAL SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/21016/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010631592026

Filing Number

CRM-M/28724/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/21016/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATPAL SINGH

    Adv. Sumeet Puri

  2. 2.SATPAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.SATPAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/21016/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted absolute anticipatory bail to petitioner Satpal Singh under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, in connection with FIR No.164 (Sections 316(2) and 318(4) BNS). The court found that Singh had complied with the interim bail order by joining the investigation and fully cooperating with authorities, and the State confirmed no further custodial interrogation was needed. The bail remains conditional on continued cooperation with investigating agencies, with liberty for the State to seek cancellation if the petitioner fails to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/21016/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/21016/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted absolute anticipatory bail to petitioner Satpal Singh under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, in connection with FIR No.164 (Sections 316(2) and 318(4) BNS). The court found that Singh had complied with the interim bail order by joining the investigation and fully cooperating with authorities, and the State confirmed no further custodial interrogation was needed. The bail remains conditional on continued cooperation with investigating agencies, with liberty for the State to seek cancellation if the petitioner fails to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case