SANJIV KUMAR AND ANR vs RAVI KANT AND ORS — CR/4363/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010626222024
Filing Number
CR/25485/2024
Filing Date
09-May-2024
Registration No
CR/4363/2024
Registration Date
02-Aug-2024
Judge
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Coram
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Bench Type
Single
Category
30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJIV KUMAR AND ANR
Adv. RIDHI BANSAL
-
2.RAVI KANT
-
3.RAJEEV KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAVI KANT AND ORS
-
2.RAVI KANT
-
3.RAJEEV KUMAR
-
4.ABINASH CHANDER
-
5.SURINDER KUMAR
-
6.SUSHIL KUMAR
-
7.VIJAY KUMAR
-
8.PARSHOTAM LAL
-
9.PARVEEN KUMARI
-
10.DEEPAK
-
11.SURINDER KUMARI
-
12.DAYA KRISHAN
-
13.AVTAR KRISHAN
-
14.AMAN
-
15.VISHAL
-
16.SURINDER MOHAN
-
17.BRIJ MOHAN
-
18.RAVINDER KUMAR
-
19.OM PARKASH
-
20.DEEPAK KUMAR
-
21.ASHWANI KUMAR
-
22.RAJESH KUMAR
-
23.RAKESH KUMAR
-
24.SURINDER KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur JeewanView PDF
Case Summary: CR/4363/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition seeking to set aside the Additional Civil Judge's order dated 07.02.2024 (which had dismissed the petitioners' objections to a Local Commissioner's report in Civil Suit No. CM-38-2014). The court found the petition infructuous since the underlying civil suit was already decreed by the trial court on 18.09.2025, and disposed of the petition for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of parties despite being called twice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CR/4363/2024
Case Summary: CR/4363/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition seeking to set aside the Additional Civil Judge's order dated 07.02.2024 (which had dismissed the petitioners' objections to a Local Commissioner's report in Civil Suit No. CM-38-2014). The court found the petition infructuous since the underlying civil suit was already decreed by the trial court on 18.09.2025, and disposed of the petition for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of parties despite being called twice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts