SURINDER KUMAR SAGGU vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11475/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010623222026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22211/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11475/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor , Ms. Justice Ramesh Kumari

Coram

Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor , Ms. Justice Ramesh Kumari

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURINDER KUMAR SAGGU

    Adv. Hanee Azad

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.Collector District Magistrate cum Deputy

  4. 4.Tehsildar cum Executive Magistrate Ludhiana West

  5. 5.True Home Finance Ltd

  6. 6.Rinku Devi

  7. 7.Raj Kumar Singh

  8. 8.Parveen Kumar

  9. 9.Renu Arora

  10. 10.Ms Kumar Printing and Textile

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor,ms. Justice Ramesh KumariView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the Civil Writ Petition as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel withdrew it. However, the court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal within 10 days, with parties maintaining status quo until then, and clarified that the Tribunal should decide interim relief applications on merits without being influenced by this court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11475/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the Civil Writ Petition as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel withdrew it. However, the court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal within 10 days, with parties maintaining status quo until then, and clarified that the Tribunal should decide interim relief applications on merits without being influenced by this court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case