RUPESH KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/20664/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010620072026

Filing Number

CRM-M/28039/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20664/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUPESH KUMAR

    Adv. YASHVEER KHARB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/20664/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Rupesh Kumar, arrested in August 2022 for possessing 120 gms of methamphetamine under NDPS Act Sections 21(C), 29/31/61, and 85. The court cited parity with the co-accused who had already been granted bail, and emphasized the constitutional right to speedy trial. Despite the commercial quantity of drugs recovered, the court found that only 2 of 21 prosecution witnesses had been examined after nearly 4 years of incarceration, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents. The court ordered release on furnishing bail/surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20664/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/20664/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Rupesh Kumar, arrested in August 2022 for possessing 120 gms of methamphetamine under NDPS Act Sections 21(C), 29/31/61, and 85. The court cited parity with the co-accused who had already been granted bail, and emphasized the constitutional right to speedy trial. Despite the commercial quantity of drugs recovered, the court found that only 2 of 21 prosecution witnesses had been examined after nearly 4 years of incarceration, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents. The court ordered release on furnishing bail/surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case