SUCHA SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CWP/11865/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010618472026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22004/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11865/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 and 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUCHA SINGH

    Adv. GAGANDEEP SINGH SIMBLE

  2. 2.State Of Punjab And Another

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.State Of Punjab And Another

  3. 3.District Commissioner cum Collector, Gurdaspur,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/11865/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Sucha Singh's petition seeking issuance of a 'Red Card' under the 1985 Relief and Resettlement scheme for anti-Sikh riot migrants. The court directed Singh to appear before the Deputy Commissioner, Gurdaspur, with all available documents to substantiate his migration claim, with the authorities to decide the matter within three months. This was the petitioner's third round of litigation after previous cases in 2013 and 2022 remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11865/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/11865/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Sucha Singh's petition seeking issuance of a 'Red Card' under the 1985 Relief and Resettlement scheme for anti-Sikh riot migrants. The court directed Singh to appear before the Deputy Commissioner, Gurdaspur, with all available documents to substantiate his migration claim, with the authorities to decide the matter within three months. This was the petitioner's third round of litigation after previous cases in 2013 and 2022 remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case