SUMIT vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/20887/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010615892025

Filing Number

CRM-M/32400/2025

Filing Date

21-Apr-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/20887/2025

Registration Date

21-Apr-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMIT

    Adv. SAURABH DALAL

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M No.20887/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Sumit, who was arrested on 19.02.2025 for alleged involvement in an unlawful assembly attack. The court found that while Sumit was charged with participating in the assault, he was empty-handed and allegedly delivered only fist blows, whereas the main injuries were attributed to co-accused Gaurav. Considering Sumit's 11+ months of incarceration, clean criminal record, lack of material trial progress (no witnesses examined of 30), and that the case will take considerable time, the court deemed bail appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20887/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M No.20887/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Sumit, who was arrested on 19.02.2025 for alleged involvement in an unlawful assembly attack. The court found that while Sumit was charged with participating in the assault, he was empty-handed and allegedly delivered only fist blows, whereas the main injuries were attributed to co-accused Gaurav. Considering Sumit's 11+ months of incarceration, clean criminal record, lack of material trial progress (no witnesses examined of 30), and that the case will take considerable time, the court deemed bail appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case