SUTIKSHAN KALIA vs STATE OF U T CHANDIGARH — CRM-M/47047/2018
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010611982018
Next Hearing
25th October 2018
Filing Number
CRM-M/47047/2018
Filing Date
22-10-2018
Registration No
CRM-M/47047/2018
Registration Date
22-10-2018
Judge
MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT
Coram
MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
38.3 - PROCEEDING STAYED IN QUASHING ( 197 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUTIKSHAN KALIA
Adv. A.D.S.SUKHIJA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF U T CHANDIGARH
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-10-2018 | |
| 16-11-2018 |
Orders
MRS JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Case Summary: CRM-M/47047/2018 - Sutikshan Kalia v. State of U.T. Chandigarh The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Sutikshan Kalia's petition and set aside the trial court's order permitting the prosecution to send case property for re-examination under the NDPS Act. The court held that re-testing or re-sampling cannot be ordered routinely; it is permissible only in exceptional circumstances with compelling reasons recorded by the judge, and applications must be filed within 15 days of receiving the test report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM-M/47047/2018 - Sutikshan Kalia v. State of U.T. Chandigarh The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Sutikshan Kalia's petition and set aside the trial court's order permitting the prosecution to send case property for re-examination under the NDPS Act. The court held that re-testing or re-sampling cannot be ordered routinely; it is permissible only in exceptional circumstances with compelling reasons recorded by the judge, and applications must be filed within 15 days of receiving the test report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts