NISHA THAKRAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CWP/11241/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010610182026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21672/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11241/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.11 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(SR.EDUCATION DEPT) ( 706 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NISHA THAKRAL

    Adv. RAJESH SHARMA

  2. 2.State of Haryana through Additional Chief Secretary and another

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.State of Haryana through Additional Chief Secretary and another

  3. 3.Director General of Higher Education Department

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-11241-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Nisha Thakral's petition seeking deemed service recognition from 19.09.2019 with consequential benefits. The court directed the Director General of Higher Education to decide her pending representation (dated 11.03.2026) within three months by passing a reasoned order, with non-compliance attracting costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11241/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-11241-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Nisha Thakral's petition seeking deemed service recognition from 19.09.2019 with consequential benefits. The court directed the Director General of Higher Education to decide her pending representation (dated 11.03.2026) within three months by passing a reasoned order, with non-compliance attracting costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case