MANHARBHAI LAXMANDAS PARYANI AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/20029/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010609372026

Filing Number

CRM-M/27526/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20029/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANHARBHAI LAXMANDAS PARYANI AND ANR

    Adv. ABHINAV SOOD

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.PARYANI NARAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the anticipatory bail application of petitioners Manharbhai Laxmandas Paryani and another in a cheating case involving Rs.70+ lakhs. The court rejected arguments that the matter was purely civil, finding serious allegations of economic fraud with active participation by the petitioners and their non-cooperative conduct despite investigation notices. Following Supreme Court precedent that anticipatory bail is extraordinary relief rarely granted in serious economic offences requiring custodial interrogation, the court found the case unsuitable for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20029/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the anticipatory bail application of petitioners Manharbhai Laxmandas Paryani and another in a cheating case involving Rs.70+ lakhs. The court rejected arguments that the matter was purely civil, finding serious allegations of economic fraud with active participation by the petitioners and their non-cooperative conduct despite investigation notices. Following Supreme Court precedent that anticipatory bail is extraordinary relief rarely granted in serious economic offences requiring custodial interrogation, the court found the case unsuitable for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case