SUHWINDER KAUR ALIAS SUKHWINDER KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/19993/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010608792026

Filing Number

CRM-M/27477/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/19993/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUHWINDER KAUR ALIAS SUKHWINDER KAUR

    Adv. NITIN NARULA

  2. 2.SUKHWINDER KAUR @ SUKHWINDER KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.SUKHWINDER KAUR @ SUKHWINDER KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-19993-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the petitioner Suhwinder Kaur's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged strangulation and murder charges (FIR No.0057, registered under IPC sections 302, 201, 120-B, 149). The court made absolute the interim bail order granted on 10.04.2026, subject to compliance with Section 482(2) BNSS conditions, after confirming the petitioner had joined the investigation and cooperated fully with the investigating agency. However, the bail remains conditional—if the petitioner fails to cooperate with the investigating agency as required, the State retains the liberty to seek cancellation of the anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/19993/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-19993-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the petitioner Suhwinder Kaur's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged strangulation and murder charges (FIR No.0057, registered under IPC sections 302, 201, 120-B, 149). The court made absolute the interim bail order granted on 10.04.2026, subject to compliance with Section 482(2) BNSS conditions, after confirming the petitioner had joined the investigation and cooperated fully with the investigating agency. However, the bail remains conditional—if the petitioner fails to cooperate with the investigating agency as required, the State retains the liberty to seek cancellation of the anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case