MADHU AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRM-M/20881/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010607952025

Filing Number

CRM-M/31883/2025

Filing Date

19-Apr-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/20881/2025

Registration Date

21-Apr-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHU AND ANOTHER

    Adv. NAVEEN SHARMA

  2. 2.MADHU

  3. 3.PRIYANKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MADHU

  3. 3.PRIYANKA

  4. 4.SAURABH GABA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No.191 (dated 24.07.2021) under sections 323, 324, 341, 506, 452, and 34 IPC filed at Police Station Salem Tabri, Ludhiana, after the Judicial Magistrate confirmed that the parties had reached a genuine voluntary compromise without coercion or undue influence. The court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings and applied established precedent allowing quashing of FIRs based on valid compromises in cases involving bailable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20881/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No.191 (dated 24.07.2021) under sections 323, 324, 341, 506, 452, and 34 IPC filed at Police Station Salem Tabri, Ludhiana, after the Judicial Magistrate confirmed that the parties had reached a genuine voluntary compromise without coercion or undue influence. The court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings and applied established precedent allowing quashing of FIRs based on valid compromises in cases involving bailable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case