BIKRAMJEET SINGH @ BIKRAMJIT SINGH @ BIKKAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRM-M/20305/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010605802026

Filing Number

CRM-M/27237/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20305/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIKRAMJEET SINGH @ BIKRAMJIT SINGH @ BIKKAR

    Adv. SANJEEV K. VIRK

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.AJAYPAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-20305-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed the proclamation order declaring Bikramjeet Singh a proclaimed offender, finding the trial court violated mandatory procedural requirements under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court held that proper proclamation requires recorded judicial satisfaction that the accused absconded or concealed himself—a foundational requirement absent here, particularly since the petitioner was lawfully abroad pursuing studies when the proclamation was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20305/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-20305-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed the proclamation order declaring Bikramjeet Singh a proclaimed offender, finding the trial court violated mandatory procedural requirements under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court held that proper proclamation requires recorded judicial satisfaction that the accused absconded or concealed himself—a foundational requirement absent here, particularly since the petitioner was lawfully abroad pursuing studies when the proclamation was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case