MDS CONTRACTOR THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH DALIP SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS — CWP/11079/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010604402026
e-Filing Number
08-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/21506/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/11079/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Coram
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Category
63.66 - CASE RLT TO REL OF PAY OF WRK DON UND ORD GOVT FUN ( 759 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MDS CONTRACTOR THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH DALIP SINGH
Adv. SANDEEP BHATIA
-
2.State of Haryana through its Additional Chief Secretary and others
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.State of Haryana through its Additional Chief Secretary and others
-
3.Engineering in Chief Public
-
4.Superintending Engineer (SE)
-
5.Executive Engineer
-
6.Sub Divisional Engineer
-
7.Sub Divisional Engineer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Haryana to release payment to MDS Contractor for work performed within 4 months, with 9% interest applicable if payment is delayed beyond that period. The court accepted the state's assurance that admitted liability would be discharged after competent authority review, while allowing the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities for any disputed amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/11079/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Haryana to release payment to MDS Contractor for work performed within 4 months, with 9% interest applicable if payment is delayed beyond that period. The court accepted the state's assurance that admitted liability would be discharged after competent authority review, while allowing the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities for any disputed amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts