PARVESH KUMAR PARVESH KUMAR vs NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS — CWP/11152/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010603672026
e-Filing Number
08-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/21463/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/11152/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Coram
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Category
63.15 - MISC. UOI ( 741 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARVESH KUMAR PARVESH KUMAR
-
2.National Insurance Company Limited through its Chairman cum Managing Director and others
Respondent(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS
-
2.National Insurance Company Limited through its Chairman cum Managing Director and others
-
3.Medi Assist Insurance TPA Pvt Ltd
-
4.Insurance Regulatory and Development
-
5.Indian Bank Managing Corporate
-
6.Indian Bank chief Executive Complex Center Parade Mumbai 400005 Association through its World
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Insurance Ombudsman to expeditiously consider and decide Parvesh Kumar's insurance claim application within six weeks, after his claim was repudiated by National Insurance Company Limited. The court accepted the petitioner's modified prayer for time-bound redressal through the Ombudsman rather than setting aside the rejection letter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/11152/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Insurance Ombudsman to expeditiously consider and decide Parvesh Kumar's insurance claim application within six weeks, after his claim was repudiated by National Insurance Company Limited. The court accepted the petitioner's modified prayer for time-bound redressal through the Ombudsman rather than setting aside the rejection letter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts