KULDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — CWP/11093/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010602242026

e-Filing Number

08-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21401/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11093/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP SINGH

    Adv. ABHISHEK SINGLA

  2. 2.State of Punjab, through its Principal Secretary

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  2. 2.State of Punjab, through its Principal Secretary

  3. 3.Punjab State Transmission Corporation Limited (PSTCL) Through its Chairman cum Managing Director

  4. 4.Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) Through its Chairman cum Managing Director

  5. 5.Sub Divisional Officer (Electricity) PSPCL

  6. 6.Executive Engineer (PSTCL)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petitioner's challenge to installation of a 22KV power grid on his private land in Mohali after PSTCL agreed to calculate and pay compensation within two weeks as per the February 3, 2025 notification. The petitioner retains the right to challenge the compensation amount if dissatisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11093/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petitioner's challenge to installation of a 22KV power grid on his private land in Mohali after PSTCL agreed to calculate and pay compensation within two weeks as per the February 3, 2025 notification. The petitioner retains the right to challenge the compensation amount if dissatisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case