JASDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11143/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010602182026

e-Filing Number

08-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21409/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11143/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. BIKRAMJIT SINGH BAJWA

  2. 2.Jasdeep Singh and Another

  3. 3.Nxxx Kxxx

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Jasdeep Singh and Another

  3. 3.Nxxx Kxxx

  4. 4.Gandhi Vanita Ashram through Caretaker

  5. 5.Civil Surgeon

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition by directing Government Medical College, Amritsar to constitute a Board of Doctors to conduct an ossification test on Petitioner No. 2 within four weeks, to determine her actual age. The court noted that while Petitioner No. 2 is officially recorded as a minor with no authentic birth proof, the State agreed to conduct the test provided the petitioners bear the cost, which the petitioners accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11143/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition by directing Government Medical College, Amritsar to constitute a Board of Doctors to conduct an ossification test on Petitioner No. 2 within four weeks, to determine her actual age. The court noted that while Petitioner No. 2 is officially recorded as a minor with no authentic birth proof, the State agreed to conduct the test provided the petitioners bear the cost, which the petitioners accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case