SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/20505/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010602142026

Filing Number

CRM-M/27062/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20505/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR SINGAL

  2. 2.SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Sunil Kumar, who had been in custody for over 13 months on charges of knife attack causing grievous injury in a land dispute case (FIR No. 0211, Samalkha Police Station). The court found that prolonged detention without trial prospect violated Article 21 rights, noting the petitioner's clean antecedents, completed investigation, framed charges, and zero witness examination despite 15 prosecution witnesses listed. The court ordered release on furnishing bail bonds, emphasizing that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20505/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Sunil Kumar, who had been in custody for over 13 months on charges of knife attack causing grievous injury in a land dispute case (FIR No. 0211, Samalkha Police Station). The court found that prolonged detention without trial prospect violated Article 21 rights, noting the petitioner's clean antecedents, completed investigation, framed charges, and zero witness examination despite 15 prosecution witnesses listed. The court ordered release on furnishing bail bonds, emphasizing that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case