AKASH @ AAKASH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/22940/2024

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010602072024

Filing Number

CRM-M/35508/2024

Filing Date

06-May-2024

Registration No

CRM-M/22940/2024

Registration Date

06-May-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH @ AAKASH

    Adv. BALJEET BENIWAL

  2. 2.AKASH @ AAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.AKASH @ AAKASH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-22940/2024 Court Decision: The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petitioner Akash's bail petition for a serious crime involving murder (IPC Section 302), unlawful assembly (Section 34), and destruction of evidence (Section 201). Justice Sumeet Goel found the allegations grave and specific, indicating the petitioner's active participation in a January 2022 killing where he allegedly held a witness while his co-accused fatally shot the victim. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's four-year custody, emphasizing that prolonged incarceration alone cannot outweigh the heinous nature of the offense, gravity of charges punishable by life imprisonment, and risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/22940/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-22940/2024 Court Decision: The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petitioner Akash's bail petition for a serious crime involving murder (IPC Section 302), unlawful assembly (Section 34), and destruction of evidence (Section 201). Justice Sumeet Goel found the allegations grave and specific, indicating the petitioner's active participation in a January 2022 killing where he allegedly held a witness while his co-accused fatally shot the victim. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's four-year custody, emphasizing that prolonged incarceration alone cannot outweigh the heinous nature of the offense, gravity of charges punishable by life imprisonment, and risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case