GEETANJALI AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CWP/11051/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010601822026

e-Filing Number

08-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21394/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11051/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.33 - SENIORITY DISPUTE EMP. SR. SECONDARY EDU DEPT PB ( 789 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GEETANJALI AND OTHERS

    Adv. SHREESH KAKKAR

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  3. 3.Director School Education, Secondary, Punjab

  4. 4.Anupma Garg

  5. 5.Getanjali Mehta

  6. 6.Meenakshi Gupta

  7. 7.Monika

  8. 8.Rajwant Kaur

  9. 9.Rajesh Goyal

  10. 10.Rimmi

  11. 11.Suman Sharma

  12. 12.Sonia

  13. 13.Sunita

  14. 14.Suman Lata

  15. 15.Seema Sharma

  16. 16.Tarun Bala

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  3. 3.Director School Education, Secondary, Punjab

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to expeditiously consider and decide pending objections filed by the petitioners against the Master Cadre seniority list dated 05.08.2024, wherein they were placed below juniors solely based on later appointment letter issuance. The court issued a speaking order within three months with an opportunity of hearing, without adjudicating the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11051/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to expeditiously consider and decide pending objections filed by the petitioners against the Master Cadre seniority list dated 05.08.2024, wherein they were placed below juniors solely based on later appointment letter issuance. The court issued a speaking order within three months with an opportunity of hearing, without adjudicating the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case