BALWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/11168/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010601362026

e-Filing Number

08-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21379/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11168/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.11 - SCOSB (HARYANA) ( 453 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. G.S. GOPERA

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Amit Kumar

  4. 4.Superitending engineer

  5. 5.Superitending engineer

  6. 6.Superintending Engineer

  7. 7.Mukesh Kumar

  8. 8.Mrs Rubi Rani

  9. 9.Gurdev Singh

  10. 10.Tauyab Hussain

  11. 11.Parveen Kumar

  12. 12.Jamail Singh

  13. 13.Aakashdeep Sharma

  14. 14.Avtar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Amit Kumar

  4. 4.Superitending engineer

  5. 5.Superitending engineer

  6. 6.Superintending Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the State of Haryana to treat it as a comprehensive representation, considering the petitioners' claim for service regularization after 10 years of service in accordance with precedent judgments (Joginder vs State of Haryana and Manak Singh vs State of Punjab). The State must pass a reasoned order within 3 months after hearing the petitioners, and if entitled, grant relief immediately including back pay with 12% interest and all consequential benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the State of Haryana to treat it as a comprehensive representation, considering the petitioners' claim for service regularization after 10 years of service in accordance with precedent judgments (Joginder vs State of Haryana and Manak Singh vs State of Punjab). The State must pass a reasoned order within 3 months after hearing the petitioners, and if entitled, grant relief immediately including back pay with 12% interest and all consequential benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case