SUKHRAJ SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRR/1243/2012

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Apr-2012

CNR: PHHC010599702012

Filing Number

CRR/1243/2012

Filing Date

25-Apr-2012

Registration No

CRR/1243/2012

Registration Date

25-Apr-2012

Judge

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Coram

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Bench Type

Single

Category

37.35 - CRL REV AGNST CONV (GENERAL ONE YEAR) ( 617 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHRAJ SINGH

    Adv. KULBHUSHAN RAHEJA

  2. 2.SUKHRAJ SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF

    Summary of CRR 1243/2012 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld Sukhraj Singh's conviction for forgery and cheating (IPC Sections 420, 467, 471) but reduced his sentence to time already served. Singh had falsified his date of birth on school certificates from 01.01.1977 to 01.01.1974 to meet age requirements for police recruitment in 1994. The court found the conviction sound but granted leniency given Singh's 25+ years in legal proceedings and 14 years of good conduct while sentence was suspended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jul-2012

    Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri

  4. 18-Jul-2012

    —

    Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg

  5. 26-Apr-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1243/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRR 1243/2012 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld Sukhraj Singh's conviction for forgery and cheating (IPC Sections 420, 467, 471) but reduced his sentence to time already served. Singh had falsified his date of birth on school certificates from 01.01.1977 to 01.01.1974 to meet age requirements for police recruitment in 1994. The court found the conviction sound but granted leniency given Singh's 25+ years in legal proceedings and 14 years of good conduct while sentence was suspended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case