BAL BAHADUR SHARKHI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/20194/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010598042026

Filing Number

CRM-M/26848/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20194/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAL BAHADUR SHARKHI

    Adv. JAYADITYA GUPTA

  2. 2.BAL BAHADUR SHARKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.BAL BAHADUR SHARKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-20194-2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Bal Bahadur Sharki's second bail petition, holding that prolonged custody alone cannot justify bail in serious offences like dacoity (punishable up to life imprisonment). Justice Manisha Batra found the allegations prima facie serious and rejected arguments based on trial delay, emphasizing that bail is discretionary and requires consideration of offence gravity, evidence nature, and absconding risk—not merely time spent in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-20194-2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Bal Bahadur Sharki's second bail petition, holding that prolonged custody alone cannot justify bail in serious offences like dacoity (punishable up to life imprisonment). Justice Manisha Batra found the allegations prima facie serious and rejected arguments based on trial delay, emphasizing that bail is discretionary and requires consideration of offence gravity, evidence nature, and absconding risk—not merely time spent in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case