BALWINDER KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CWP/10976/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010597862026

e-Filing Number

07-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21268/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/10976/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.1 - GOVT SERVICE (PB)-SB ( 771 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALWINDER KAUR

    Adv. VIDUSHI KUMAR

  2. 2.Balwinder Kaur

  3. 3.The Director

  4. 4.Veerpal Kaur Batth

  5. 5.Inderjit Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.Balwinder Kaur

  3. 3.The Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition by directing the State of Punjab to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioners' legal notice (dated 06.03.2026) regarding pay scale enhancement for Treasury Officers, by passing a reasoned order within three months and affording them a hearing. The court did not adjudicate the merits, noting the petitioners' case was covered by previous Supreme Court-upheld judgments (Satnam Singh 2013 and Jang Bahadur Singh 2024) on the same issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/10976/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition by directing the State of Punjab to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioners' legal notice (dated 06.03.2026) regarding pay scale enhancement for Treasury Officers, by passing a reasoned order within three months and affording them a hearing. The court did not adjudicate the merits, noting the petitioners' case was covered by previous Supreme Court-upheld judgments (Satnam Singh 2013 and Jang Bahadur Singh 2024) on the same issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case