SHIVA VERMA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/19851/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010597742026
Filing Number
CRM-M/26822/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/19851/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Coram
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.11 - REGULAR BAIL OF CYBER CRIME PUNJAB ( 211 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVA VERMA
Adv. JASVIR SINGH DHALIWAL
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M/19851/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed petitioner Shiva Verma's bail petition in a cybercrime and money laundering case. Verma was accused of conspiring with co-accused to facilitate withdrawal of Rs. 90 lakh obtained through cyber fraud from a victim deceived by a fake CBI officer call. CCTV footage placed Verma at the bank during money withdrawals, and investigation revealed his active role in procuring bank accounts and facilitating transfers of fraudulently obtained funds. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in an organized cyber fraud operation and rejected bail, citing gravity of allegations, risk of evidence tampering, and prior involvement in similar cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/19851/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M/19851/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed petitioner Shiva Verma's bail petition in a cybercrime and money laundering case. Verma was accused of conspiring with co-accused to facilitate withdrawal of Rs. 90 lakh obtained through cyber fraud from a victim deceived by a fake CBI officer call. CCTV footage placed Verma at the bank during money withdrawals, and investigation revealed his active role in procuring bank accounts and facilitating transfers of fraudulently obtained funds. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in an organized cyber fraud operation and rejected bail, citing gravity of allegations, risk of evidence tampering, and prior involvement in similar cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts