KULWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11125/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010596942026
e-Filing Number
07-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/21248/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/11125/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Category
68.1 - GOVT SERVICE (PB)-SB ( 771 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS
Adv. SUPINDER SINGH SOHI
-
2.KULWINDER SINGH
-
3.BALRAJ SHARMA
-
4.SOHAN LAL
-
5.SUKHJINDER SINGH
-
6.GAGANDEEP RANI
-
7.GURJIT SINGH
-
8.CHAMKOUR SINGH
-
9.SUNIL KUMAR
-
10.SAROJ BALA
-
11.SANDEEP KUMAR
-
12.INDERJIT KAUR
-
13.VARINDER KUMAR
-
14.SUKHDEV SINGH
-
15.ANITA RANI
-
16.VIKAS KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.KULWINDER SINGH
-
3.BALRAJ SHARMA
-
4.SOHAN LAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without adjudicating its merits, directing the State to consider and decide the petitioners' legal notice regarding pay scale revision under the Punjab Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009 by passing a reasoned order within three months. The court's approach was based on the petitioners' modified prayer and the State's non-objection to expeditiously process their grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/11125/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without adjudicating its merits, directing the State to consider and decide the petitioners' legal notice regarding pay scale revision under the Punjab Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009 by passing a reasoned order within three months. The court's approach was based on the petitioners' modified prayer and the State's non-objection to expeditiously process their grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts