SUBEG SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/19781/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010596542026

Filing Number

CRM-M/26740/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/19781/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBEG SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. RAHUL GARG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court quashed FIR No.0112 against Subeg Singh and another, registered under BNS sections 324(4), 329(3), 115(2), 351(3), and 3(5) at Police Station Sadar Nabha, District Patiala. The court found that the parties had genuinely settled their dispute through a compromise deed dated 29.01.2026, verified by the trial magistrate as voluntary and without coercion, making continuation of criminal proceedings a futile exercise and abuse of process. The parties remain bound by the compromise terms and their recorded statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/19781/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court quashed FIR No.0112 against Subeg Singh and another, registered under BNS sections 324(4), 329(3), 115(2), 351(3), and 3(5) at Police Station Sadar Nabha, District Patiala. The court found that the parties had genuinely settled their dispute through a compromise deed dated 29.01.2026, verified by the trial magistrate as voluntary and without coercion, making continuation of criminal proceedings a futile exercise and abuse of process. The parties remain bound by the compromise terms and their recorded statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case