VIJETA ABD ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CWP/11115/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010595852026

e-Filing Number

07-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21217/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11115/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.7 - SERVICE-EDU-PUNJAB(SECONDARY)(TGT) ( 796 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJETA ABD ANOTHER

    Adv. SUPINDER SINGH SOHI

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY

  3. 3.DIRECTOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY

  3. 3.DIRECTOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without addressing the merits, directing the State of Punjab to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioners' legal notice (dated 09.02.2026) regarding notional and consequential benefits including seniority and pay parity for employees recruited under the same 28.02.2020 advertisement. The court mandated a reasoned decision be passed within 3 months after providing a hearing opportunity to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11115/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without addressing the merits, directing the State of Punjab to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioners' legal notice (dated 09.02.2026) regarding notional and consequential benefits including seniority and pay parity for employees recruited under the same 28.02.2020 advertisement. The court mandated a reasoned decision be passed within 3 months after providing a hearing opportunity to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case