UNION OF INDIA vs JASPREET SINGH — CWP/15141/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010595402026
e-Filing Number
07-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/21222/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/15141/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Category
4.8 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ( 364 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
Adv. NARENDER KUMAR VASHIST
-
2.Jaspreet Singh
-
3.Department of Posts
-
4.Assistant Director Postal Services Staff Punjab Circle
-
5.Gagandeep Singh
-
6.Vinod Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.JASPREET SINGH
-
2.Jaspreet Singh
-
3.Department of Posts
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
CWP No. 15141 of 2026 – Case Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's order directing reconsideration of Jaspreet Singh's compassionate appointment claim. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that two ineligible candidates ranked above Singh (who scored 41 marks at rank 11) were improperly appointed despite lacking requisite educational qualifications, thereby ousting an eligible candidate. The court held that eligibility criteria are mandatory even for compassionate appointments, and when 20 candidates compete for 10 vacancies, ineligible candidates cannot be appointed ahead of eligible ones merely through post-hoc relaxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/15141/2026
CWP No. 15141 of 2026 – Case Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's order directing reconsideration of Jaspreet Singh's compassionate appointment claim. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that two ineligible candidates ranked above Singh (who scored 41 marks at rank 11) were improperly appointed despite lacking requisite educational qualifications, thereby ousting an eligible candidate. The court held that eligibility criteria are mandatory even for compassionate appointments, and when 20 candidates compete for 10 vacancies, ineligible candidates cannot be appointed ahead of eligible ones merely through post-hoc relaxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts