PARAMJIT KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11124/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010594922026

e-Filing Number

07-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21168/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11124/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.3 - GOVT SERVICE (PB) MEDICAL REIM ( 786 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAMJIT KAUR

    Adv. Ritesh Aggarwal

  2. 2.PARAMJIT KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.PARAMJIT KAUR

  3. 3.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

  4. 4.COMMISSIONER FEROZEPUR DIVISION

  5. 5.ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UD

  6. 6.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  7. 7.DIRECTOR HEALTH SERVICE PUNJAB

  8. 8.CIVIL SURGEON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without adjudicating the merits, directing the State of Punjab to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice (dated 29.12.2025) for reimbursement of Rs. 5,53,127/- in medical expenses within two months by passing a reasoned order after hearing. The court's approach allowed for administrative redressal while preserving the petitioner's rights for further recourse if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without adjudicating the merits, directing the State of Punjab to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice (dated 29.12.2025) for reimbursement of Rs. 5,53,127/- in medical expenses within two months by passing a reasoned order after hearing. The court's approach allowed for administrative redressal while preserving the petitioner's rights for further recourse if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case