MS AMAN MARBEL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11002/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Feb-2026

CNR: PHHC010594662026

e-Filing Number

07-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21148/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11002/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.66 - CASE RLT TO REL OF PAY OF WRK DON UND ORD GOVT FUN ( 759 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS AMAN MARBEL

    Adv. CHIRAG SURI

  2. 2.Ms Aman Marbel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Ms Aman Marbel

  3. 3.Director Panchayat Rural Development and Panchgayat Development

  4. 4.Additional Deputy Commissioner

  5. 5.District Development Officer

  6. 6.Block development and Panchayat Officer

  7. 7.Block Development Officer

  8. 8.Gram Panchayat

  9. 9.Gram panchayat

  10. 10.Gram panchayat

  11. 11.Gram panchayat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to release payment to M/s Aman Marbel for work carried out within 4 months, with an assurance from the State's counsel that the competent authority would consider the claim. If payment is not released within the stipulated period, the State becomes liable to pay 9% interest; the petitioner may approach appropriate authority regarding any disputed amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11002/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to release payment to M/s Aman Marbel for work carried out within 4 months, with an assurance from the State's counsel that the competent authority would consider the claim. If payment is not released within the stipulated period, the State becomes liable to pay 9% interest; the petitioner may approach appropriate authority regarding any disputed amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case