ARVIND AGGARWAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/20899/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010594042026

Filing Number

FAO/21099/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20899/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.29 - QUASHING PET U/S 482 CRPC GEN IN U/S 138 NI ACT ( 649 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND AGGARWAL

    Adv. SUMIT SINGH BAIRAGI

  2. 2.ARVIND AGGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.ARVIND AGGARWAL

  3. 3.ROHIT AGGARWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Arvind Aggarwal's petition, holding that the Additional Sessions Judge's dismissal of his revision petition on mere technical grounds of 30 days' delay was unduly strict. The Court condemned the lower court for failing to decide the condonation application for 3.5 years before dismissing without substantial reasons. The Court condoned the delay, remitted the revision petition for merit-based reconsideration within three months, and imposed Rs. 10,000 compensatory costs on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20899/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Arvind Aggarwal's petition, holding that the Additional Sessions Judge's dismissal of his revision petition on mere technical grounds of 30 days' delay was unduly strict. The Court condemned the lower court for failing to decide the condonation application for 3.5 years before dismissing without substantial reasons. The Court condoned the delay, remitted the revision petition for merit-based reconsideration within three months, and imposed Rs. 10,000 compensatory costs on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case