SUNITA AND OTHERS vs OMPARKASH AND OTHERS — FAO/2399/2025
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010593672025
Filing Number
FAO/22975/2025
Filing Date
09-Apr-2025
Registration No
FAO/2399/2025
Registration Date
19-Apr-2025
Judge
Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta
Coram
Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta
Category
500.21 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 886 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNITA AND OTHERS
Adv. PANKAJ ATTRI`
-
2.OMPARKASH
-
3.SACHIN SHARMA
-
4.PUNEET SHARMA
-
5.GAYTRI DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.OMPARKASH AND OTHERS
-
2.OMPARKASH
-
3.SACHIN SHARMA
-
4.PUNEET SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF
Summary of FAO/2399/2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court partly allowed the appeal, increasing motor accident compensation from Rs.22,82,000 to Rs.24,14,000 for the family of deceased Sunil Kumar. While rejecting claims that the deceased earned Rs.30,000/month (finding the evidence unreliable), the court granted consortium compensation of Rs.44,000 each to all four claimants (widow, two children, and mother) instead of only the widow, maintaining 7.5% interest p.a. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/2399/2025
Summary of FAO/2399/2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court partly allowed the appeal, increasing motor accident compensation from Rs.22,82,000 to Rs.24,14,000 for the family of deceased Sunil Kumar. While rejecting claims that the deceased earned Rs.30,000/month (finding the evidence unreliable), the court granted consortium compensation of Rs.44,000 each to all four claimants (widow, two children, and mother) instead of only the widow, maintaining 7.5% interest p.a. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts