AJIT SINGH vs VIKAS NARWAL AND OTHERS — FAO/2763/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010591542024

Filing Number

FAO/24086/2024

Filing Date

02-May-2024

Registration No

FAO/2763/2024

Registration Date

31-May-2024

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Category

500.47 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 912 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIT SINGH

    Adv. ALISHA SONI

  2. 2.AJIT SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS NARWAL AND OTHERS

  2. 2.AJIT SINGH

  3. 3.RAVINDER SINGH

  4. 4.UGGARSAIN

  5. 5.THE IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO/2763/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ajit Singh's appeal seeking enhancement of motor accident compensation on both grounds of delay and merits. The court rejected Singh's 732-day delay in filing the appeal, holding that poverty and ignorance of law are insufficient grounds for condonation, and found the original tribunal award of Rs.1,39,237 was just and fair, as Singh failed to substantiate his claims of Rs.6 lakh medical expenses (only Rs.1,12,737 proved), permanent disability (no certificate provided), or referral to PGI Chandigarh (contradicted by discharge records). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/2763/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO/2763/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ajit Singh's appeal seeking enhancement of motor accident compensation on both grounds of delay and merits. The court rejected Singh's 732-day delay in filing the appeal, holding that poverty and ignorance of law are insufficient grounds for condonation, and found the original tribunal award of Rs.1,39,237 was just and fair, as Singh failed to substantiate his claims of Rs.6 lakh medical expenses (only Rs.1,12,737 proved), permanent disability (no certificate provided), or referral to PGI Chandigarh (contradicted by discharge records). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case