BHATERI DEVI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. — CRR/858/2010

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2010

CNR: PHHC010590112010

Filing Number

CRR/858/2010

Filing Date

16-Feb-2010

Registration No

CRR/858/2010

Registration Date

17-Mar-2010

Judge

Justice (To Be Nominated)

Coram

Justice (To Be Nominated)

Bench Type

Single

Category

37.5 - CRIMINAL REVISION (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) ( 151 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHATERI DEVI

    Adv. ASHISH AGGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the petition as redundant after learning that the petitioner, Bhateri Devi, had expired and her legal representatives were not brought on record to continue the proceedings. The petition, which challenged the grant of probation to respondents No.2 to 4, became infructuous due to the petitioner's death and lack of proper substitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Jul-2011

    —

    Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

  4. 04-May-2011

    —

    Mr Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia

  5. 16-Mar-2011

    —

    Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal

  6. 19-Jan-2011

    —

    Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal

  7. 26-Oct-2010

    —

    Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

  8. 19-Aug-2010

    —

    Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

  9. 11-May-2010

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Feb-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/858/2010

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the petition as redundant after learning that the petitioner, Bhateri Devi, had expired and her legal representatives were not brought on record to continue the proceedings. The petition, which challenged the grant of probation to respondents No.2 to 4, became infructuous due to the petitioner's death and lack of proper substitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case