RAVI KANT AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/19255/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010589512026

Filing Number

CRM-M/26292/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/19255/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal

Coram

Ms. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39.13 - ANTICIPATORY BAIL (AGNST WOMEN) ( 285 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KANT AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR LAMDHARIA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.NEETU SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Shalini Singh NagpalView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court made absolute the interim anticipatory bail granted to petitioners Ravi Kant and another in a dowry and cruelty case (FIR No. 29, 2026). The court rejected the state's argument that bail should be withheld because the petitioners failed to recover the complainant's passport and documents, holding that recovery is a trial matter and cannot be grounds for denying anticipatory bail. The petitioners were directed to comply with bail conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/19255/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court made absolute the interim anticipatory bail granted to petitioners Ravi Kant and another in a dowry and cruelty case (FIR No. 29, 2026). The court rejected the state's argument that bail should be withheld because the petitioners failed to recover the complainant's passport and documents, holding that recovery is a trial matter and cannot be grounds for denying anticipatory bail. The petitioners were directed to comply with bail conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case