SUNIL vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/19900/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010589382026
Filing Number
CRM-M/26304/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/19900/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Coram
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL
Adv. SACHIN KAUSHIK
-
2.SUNIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
-
2.SUNIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Sunil in an NDPS Act case, finding that while he was implicated based on a co-accused's disclosure statement (which requires independent corroboration), no recovery was effected from him, investigation was complete, and co-accused received similar bail. The court held that prolonged custody served no purpose given the lengthy trial timeline and principle of parity with similarly situated co-accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/19900/2026
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Sunil in an NDPS Act case, finding that while he was implicated based on a co-accused's disclosure statement (which requires independent corroboration), no recovery was effected from him, investigation was complete, and co-accused received similar bail. The court held that prolonged custody served no purpose given the lengthy trial timeline and principle of parity with similarly situated co-accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts