RAJWINDER vs SUNITA SHARMA — COCP/1657/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010587242026

Filing Number

COCP/20864/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

COCP/1657/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Archana Puri

Coram

Mrs. Justice Archana Puri

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJWINDER

    Adv. GURMEJ SINGH BHINDER

  2. 2.SUNITA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA SHARMA

  2. 2.SUNITA SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Archana PuriView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Rajwinder's contempt petition against Sunita Sharma as withdrawn. The petitioner had alleged willful defiance of a prior court order directing an Inquiry Committee to provide him a hearing before concluding its report; however, the State submitted that the inquiry was completed with the petitioner's full participation and statement recorded. With all relevant documents now furnished to the petitioner's counsel, the petitioner chose not to pursue the contempt case, retaining liberty to challenge the underlying order if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/1657/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Rajwinder's contempt petition against Sunita Sharma as withdrawn. The petitioner had alleged willful defiance of a prior court order directing an Inquiry Committee to provide him a hearing before concluding its report; however, the State submitted that the inquiry was completed with the petitioner's full participation and statement recorded. With all relevant documents now furnished to the petitioner's counsel, the petitioner chose not to pursue the contempt case, retaining liberty to challenge the underlying order if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case