AJAY BAJAJ vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11016/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010585862026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/20838/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11016/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY BAJAJ

    Adv. SUNNY KUMAR SINGLA

  2. 2.Ajay Bajaj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Ajay Bajaj

  3. 3.Ld Deputy Commissioner

  4. 4.Senior Superintendent of Police

  5. 5.Ld Sub Divisional Magistrate

  6. 6.Darbar Shri Dhyanpur

  7. 7.Mahant Shri Ram Sunder Dass

  8. 8.Gopal Dass alias Gaurav Babar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition seeking action against the Mahant (head) of a 670-year-old religious institute for alleged misappropriation of property and funds, finding it was a purely civil and private dispute between parties. The court noted that a civil suit was already pending between the parties and therefore declined to intervene, disposing of the petition without issuing any orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11016/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition seeking action against the Mahant (head) of a 670-year-old religious institute for alleged misappropriation of property and funds, finding it was a purely civil and private dispute between parties. The court noted that a civil suit was already pending between the parties and therefore declined to intervene, disposing of the petition without issuing any orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case