UNION OF INDIA AND ORS vs SMT RAHMATI AND ANR — CWP/11142/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010583232026

e-Filing Number

05-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/20693/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11142/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Category

4.11 - ORDERS AGAINST ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL(CIVIL) ( 328 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

    Adv. NEHA JAIN

  2. 2.Smt Rahmati and anr

  3. 3.The Chief of the Army Staff

  4. 4.Addl Dte of Pers Services AG PS (Police Station) 4 Imp Adjutant Generals Branch Integrated HQ of MoD Army Army HQs,

  5. 5.The OIC Records Records the Grenadiers Pin 908 776 CO 56 APO

  6. 6.Principal Controller of Defence Account Pension Allahabad UP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT RAHMATI AND ANR

  2. 2.Smt Rahmati and anr

  3. 3.The Chief of the Army Staff

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting service pension to respondent Rahmati, as the petitioner did not press the matter further. The court allowed the Union of India liberty to file a review petition before the Tribunal regarding the Tribunal's finding that minimum 10 months of service on last rank is not required for calculating pensionary benefits under the 6th Pay Commission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting service pension to respondent Rahmati, as the petitioner did not press the matter further. The court allowed the Union of India liberty to file a review petition before the Tribunal regarding the Tribunal's finding that minimum 10 months of service on last rank is not required for calculating pensionary benefits under the 6th Pay Commission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case