JARNAIL SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CWP/10978/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010582102026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/20685/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/10978/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.4 - SC OSB (PUNJAB) ( 466 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JARNAIL SINGH

    Adv. HARSHIT JAIN

  2. 2.state of punjab

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.state of punjab

  3. 3.Director local bodies

  4. 4.Additional Deputy Commissioner

  5. 5.municipal Council Sangrur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed respondent No. 4 to consider and decide the petitioner Jarnail Singh's legal notice dated 14.08.2025 regarding grade pay parity and pension revision by passing a speaking order within 3 months, after affording him a hearing. The court disposed of the petition on the limited prayer that respondent No. 4 would decide the representation, with the caveat that if the petitioner is found entitled, relief shall be granted forthwith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/10978/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed respondent No. 4 to consider and decide the petitioner Jarnail Singh's legal notice dated 14.08.2025 regarding grade pay parity and pension revision by passing a speaking order within 3 months, after affording him a hearing. The court disposed of the petition on the limited prayer that respondent No. 4 would decide the representation, with the caveat that if the petitioner is found entitled, relief shall be granted forthwith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case