DURJAN SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRR/3074/2010

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Nov-2010

CNR: PHHC010580802010

Filing Number

CRR/3074/2010

Filing Date

16-Nov-2010

Registration No

CRR/3074/2010

Registration Date

17-Nov-2010

Judge

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Coram

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Bench Type

Single

Category

37.35 - CRL REV AGNST CONV (GENERAL ONE YEAR) ( 617 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DURJAN SINGH AND ORS

    Adv. JARNAIL SINGH SANETA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF

    Case Summary: CRR 3074/2010 - Durjan Singh & Ors v. State of Haryana The High Court upheld the conviction of three prison guards under IPC Section 223 (negligence in performing duty) for allowing a co-accused to escape from a train near Faridabad in 2003. However, the court reduced their one-year imprisonment sentences to time already served (2+ months), considering they had faced 22 years of prosecution and remained on bail without misconduct for 15+ years. The fine of Rs. 500 each was maintained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jan-2011

    —

    Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur

  4. 18-Nov-2010

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Nov-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/3074/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR 3074/2010 - Durjan Singh & Ors v. State of Haryana The High Court upheld the conviction of three prison guards under IPC Section 223 (negligence in performing duty) for allowing a co-accused to escape from a train near Faridabad in 2003. However, the court reduced their one-year imprisonment sentences to time already served (2+ months), considering they had faced 22 years of prosecution and remained on bail without misconduct for 15+ years. The fine of Rs. 500 each was maintained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case