ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11137/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010580632026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/20574/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11137/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Category

68.26 - SERVICE-ENGINEERING-PUNJAB(PWD,B&R&PUBLIC HEALTH ( 782 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. NEERAJ SHARMA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  3. 3.Chief Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Punjab

  4. 4.Executive Engineer, Kandi Area Dam Maintenance Division No

  5. 5.Executive Engineer, Hoshiarpur Drainage Division

  6. 6.Executive Engineer, Kandi Canal Division No

  7. 7.Superintending Engineer, Kandi Canal Water Resources Circle,

  8. 8.Shingara Singh

  9. 9.Jagdish Sharma

  10. 10.Kulwant Singh

  11. 11.Uttam Chand

  12. 12.Manheer Bahadur

  13. 13.Man Bahadur

  14. 14.Vir Singh

  15. 15.Ram Bali Yadav

  16. 16.Surya Bahadur

  17. 17.Meena Sharma

  18. 18.Ramesh Kumar

  19. 19.Narjeet Sirpali

  20. 20.Chanchal Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  3. 3.Chief Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Punjab

  4. 4.Executive Engineer, Kandi Area Dam Maintenance Division No

  5. 5.Executive Engineer, Hoshiarpur Drainage Division

  6. 6.Executive Engineer, Kandi Canal Division No

  7. 7.Superintending Engineer, Kandi Canal Water Resources Circle,

  8. 8.Shingara Singh

  9. 9.Jagdish Sharma

  10. 10.Kulwant Singh

  11. 11.Uttam Chand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the writ petition and issued a Mandamus directing the State of Punjab to decide the petitioners' legal notice regarding leave encashment benefits for work-charge basis services within six weeks. The court relied on a prior Division Bench decision establishing that employees are entitled to leave encashment even for work-charge services, and both parties consented to the order with an assurance of due hearing before final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11137/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the writ petition and issued a Mandamus directing the State of Punjab to decide the petitioners' legal notice regarding leave encashment benefits for work-charge basis services within six weeks. The court relied on a prior Division Bench decision establishing that employees are entitled to leave encashment even for work-charge services, and both parties consented to the order with an assurance of due hearing before final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case