RAGVEER KUMAR @ RAGHUVIR KUMAR AND ORS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CRM-M/19852/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010579772026

Filing Number

CRM-M/25845/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/19852/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAGVEER KUMAR @ RAGHUVIR KUMAR AND ORS

    Adv. AAKASH SINGLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 67 (under IPC Sections 420, 468, 471, 120-B) and subsequent proceedings against Ragveer Kumar and others based on a genuine compromise deed between the parties. The court found that since the dispute involved commercial/financial transactions with civil flavour and both parties voluntarily settled, continuing prosecution would constitute abuse of process and injustice despite conviction being remote. The parties remain bound by compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/19852/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 67 (under IPC Sections 420, 468, 471, 120-B) and subsequent proceedings against Ragveer Kumar and others based on a genuine compromise deed between the parties. The court found that since the dispute involved commercial/financial transactions with civil flavour and both parties voluntarily settled, continuing prosecution would constitute abuse of process and injustice despite conviction being remote. The parties remain bound by compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case