NITIN ALIAS NITIN KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18849/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010573292026

Filing Number

CRM-M/25478/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18849/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN ALIAS NITIN KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. VIKAS BISHNOI

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.PAWAN ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR

  4. 4.PAWAN ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR

  5. 5.NAVEEN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Nitin Kumar and others in a case involving simple injury charges related to a land dispute. The court allowed the bail petition after the petitioners cooperated with the investigating agency and demonstrated they posed no flight risk, with co-accused already granted bail. The bail is conditional on continued cooperation with investigators, and the State retains the right to cancel it if the petitioners fail to cooperate as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18849/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Nitin Kumar and others in a case involving simple injury charges related to a land dispute. The court allowed the bail petition after the petitioners cooperated with the investigating agency and demonstrated they posed no flight risk, with co-accused already granted bail. The bail is conditional on continued cooperation with investigators, and the State retains the right to cancel it if the petitioners fail to cooperate as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case