HARI OM vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18975/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010573012026

Filing Number

CRM-M/25521/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18975/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.12 - REGULAR BAIL OF CYBER CRIME HARYANA ( 212 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI OM

    Adv. AMIT SIWACH

  2. 2.HARI OM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.HARI OM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/18975/2026 Hari Om's bail petition was dismissed by Justice Manisha Batra of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Hari Om was accused of conspiring with a co-accused to create a fake female profile ("Shivi") on social media to defraud complainant Shubham Aggarwal of Rs. 40 lakhs through romance scam tactics involving promises of marriage and false medical emergencies. The court found the allegations serious, citing rising cyber crime threats, risks of witness intimidation, ongoing arrests of co-accused, and money already transferred to petitioner's account. The court denied bail despite arguments of investigation completion and clean antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18975/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/18975/2026 Hari Om's bail petition was dismissed by Justice Manisha Batra of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Hari Om was accused of conspiring with a co-accused to create a fake female profile ("Shivi") on social media to defraud complainant Shubham Aggarwal of Rs. 40 lakhs through romance scam tactics involving promises of marriage and false medical emergencies. The court found the allegations serious, citing rising cyber crime threats, risks of witness intimidation, ongoing arrests of co-accused, and money already transferred to petitioner's account. The court denied bail despite arguments of investigation completion and clean antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case