SUNIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CWP/11159/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010572362026

e-Filing Number

05-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/20301/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11159/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.13 - MISC. HARYANA ( 739 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR

    Adv. JOHAN KUMAR

  2. 2.State of Haryana

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.State of Haryana

  3. 3.Deputy Commissioner

  4. 4.Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran

  5. 5.Administrator

  6. 6.Estate Officer

  7. 7.Land Acquisition officer

  8. 8.Bhumika Lamba

  9. 9.Sh Adesh Patwari

  10. 10.Sh Yogender Saini

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition seeking a departmental inquiry into the illegal transfer of government land in Faridabad. The State counsel assured the court that the government authorities would investigate the alleged misappropriation of public land by private persons in connivance with officials within three months and take appropriate action if wrongdoing is found. The petition was disposed without expressing any opinion on merits, based on this undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition seeking a departmental inquiry into the illegal transfer of government land in Faridabad. The State counsel assured the court that the government authorities would investigate the alleged misappropriation of public land by private persons in connivance with officials within three months and take appropriate action if wrongdoing is found. The petition was disposed without expressing any opinion on merits, based on this undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case