UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS vs SITA DEVI AND ANOTHER — CWP/10420/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010569072025
e-Filing Number
05-04-2025
Filing Number
CWP/22048/2025
Filing Date
07-Apr-2025
Registration No
CWP/10420/2025
Registration Date
07-Apr-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Bench Type
Double
Category
4.11 - ORDERS AGAINST ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL(CIVIL) ( 328 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Adv. GEETA SINGHWAL
-
2.Union of India and others
-
3.The Armed Forces Tribunal
-
4.The Principal Controller of Defence
-
5.Officer in charge
Respondent(s)
-
1.SITA DEVI AND ANOTHER
-
2.Union of India and others
-
3.The Armed Forces Tribunal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/10420/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting family pension to Sita Devi. The court held that her late husband, discharged from the Army in 1994 at his own request due to domestic problems, was not in a "low medical category" and thus was ineligible for disability pension despite having a dislocated shoulder. Since no pension was admissible to the husband, family pension could not be granted to the widow who claimed benefits 25 years after discharge and only after his death in 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/10420/2025
Case Summary: CWP/10420/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting family pension to Sita Devi. The court held that her late husband, discharged from the Army in 1994 at his own request due to domestic problems, was not in a "low medical category" and thus was ineligible for disability pension despite having a dislocated shoulder. Since no pension was admissible to the husband, family pension could not be granted to the widow who claimed benefits 25 years after discharge and only after his death in 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts